论文信息

论文解读

AI 辅助整理
方法
2017年阳山80村1600户调查数据,宗族结构与土地制度交互分析。
发现
大姓多、宗族聚会频繁的村组更倾向土地整合,最大姓氏内部越团结采纳概率越低。
机会点
可延伸研究宗族社会资本如何影响数字乡村政策落地与农户信息化采纳行为。

论文摘要

基于2017年覆盖广东阳山80个行政村、160个自然村、1600户农户的调查,发现大姓数量多、宗族聚会频繁的村组更倾向采纳土地整合,最大姓氏内部越团结采纳概率越低。交互分析表明土地碎片化越高该负向关系越弱,属相关性证据。

全文

Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems(2026,10)

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Land, Livelihoods and Food Security

Clan Structure and Induced Changes in Land Systems: Evidence from Land Consolidation and Titling Policy in Yangshan, Guangdong, China

  • Kai Liu <sup>1</sup>

  • WZ Wenjue Zhu <sup>2</sup>

  • 1. Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China

  • 2. Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China

Select one of your emails

You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:

Notify me on publication

Please enter your email address:

If you already have an account, please login

You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here

Abstract

Induced institutional change under government policy goals is an important feature of rural land governance in China. This study examines how village clan structure is associated with the adoption of land consolidation before titling in Yangshan County, Guangdong. The theoretical model focuses on negotiations over the redistribution of contracted land rights. It suggests that members of a dominant clan may resist an allocation that threatens their existing land advantages, while their anticipated position after redistribution may shape their willingness to support consolidation. The empirical analysis uses a 2017 survey covering 80 administrative villages, 160 natural villages, and 1,600 households. The reported results associate a larger number of major surnames and more frequent clan gatherings with a higher likelihood of consolidation adoption. Greater unity within the largest-surname group is associated with a lower likelihood of adoption. Exploratory interaction and subgroup results suggest that the negative unity association is weaker at higher levels of baseline land fragmentation. These findings are consistent with a distributional bargaining interpretation, but they do not identify causal effects or directly establish a land-quality mechanism. In particular, unobserved village characteristics and landholdings concentrated within the largest-surname group offer alternative explanations. The study connects informal social organization with negotiated land-policy implementation and highlights the relevance of transparent valuation, inclusive consultation, and compensation for identifiable losses.

Summary

Keywords

Clan, induced institutional change, Land consolidation, land quality heterogeneity, rural land governance

Received

10 June 2026

Accepted

26 October 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Liu and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Wenjue Zhu

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

论文原文与出版信息

Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems(2026,10)
查看论文原文

继续探索